Most GP websites trip on AHPRA advertising in the same 5 places. The first is Google reviews copied onto your own site. The next is a flat "bulk billing available" claim, then promises like "same-day appointments". Then comes "specialises in" for a doctor without specialist registration, and last, health articles nobody has checked. Here is what most guides miss. Two of those 5 are not AHPRA rules at all. They break Australian Consumer Law, the law against misleading customers. That is why practices that read the AHPRA guidelines closely still get them wrong.
Run your own practice? Then your website is advertising, and these rules apply to it. I write website copy for Australian health practices, to the advertising rules for your profession. Tell me about your site on a free 30-minute call.
Key takeaways
- Reviews on your Google Business Profile are fine. Copy them onto your own website and they become testimonials in your ads. Section 133 of the National Law, the law behind the health ad rules, bans that.
- "Bulk billing available" and "same-day appointments" break Consumer Law, the law on misleading customers. AHPRA is not the issue here. Courts look at the overall impression your words give, even when each word is true.
- You may have heard a GP can never say "specialist". That advice is wrong. A doctor with FRACGP or FACRRM holds specialist registration in general practice.
- The real breach is a doctor without specialist registration who writes "specialises in". AHPRA suggests "substantial experience in" or "working primarily in" instead.
- Health education pages get no free pass. Bought-in and AI-written articles on your site are still ads, and a disclaimer does not fix a wrong claim.
Why are Google reviews on your website a problem?
This is the most common mistake, and the one practices argue about most.
Section 133 of the National Law bans testimonials in ads for health care. A testimonial is praise for the clinical care or the result. Your own website counts as an ad. So when you pull a five-star review onto your homepage, you have published a testimonial.
What matters is who controls the page.
- Reviews on your Google Business Profile are fine. You did not pick them or place them on a page you own. They also help you show up in the local map results.
- The same reviews on your own site are not fine. Think of a review slider, a star rating widget or a "what our patients say" section. You chose those words and put them in your ads.
There is a smaller point people miss. Some comments are only about the visit itself, like parking, friendly reception staff or easy booking. Those do not touch clinical care. AHPRA treats them differently from a comment about whether the treatment worked. The AHPRA testimonial tool shows you where the line sits. Even so, your safest move is to link to your Google profile and copy nothing.
I go deeper on this in patient testimonials and AHPRA, including what you can publish instead.
Is "bulk billing available" a compliance risk?
Yes, but not for the reason you might expect. This one is not an AHPRA rule.
It falls under section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law. That section bans business conduct that misleads people, or is likely to. Running a medical practice is a business, so it applies to you. Courts do not only ask if your words are true. They ask what overall picture the words paint.
Read "Bulk billing available" the way a patient does. They see: I will be bulk billed.
Now think about how most practices really bill. Bulk billing often covers only children under 16, concession card holders, pensioners or certain item numbers. Everyone else pays a gap. Your words were true, but the picture was wrong. Leaving out a limit or a fee that patients would expect to hear about can mislead on its own.
Do not write: "Bulk billing available."
Write instead: "We bulk bill children under 16 and concession card holders. All other consultations are privately billed, with fees listed on our fees page."
The same logic catches "Medicare rebates available" and "fully covered". A rebate depends on the person, the item number and whether they qualify. So say the condition, and skip the headline.
There is a real upside here. A clear, honest fees page is one of the pages that turns visitors into patients most often. Cost is one of the first things patients search for. I cover that in what patients actually Google before booking.
What is wrong with "same-day appointments"?
It is a promise about the future that you cannot keep every time. That is the second Consumer Law trap.
Watch for this family of phrases: "same-day appointments", "no wait times", "no waitlist", "available now", "immediate access", "see a doctor today". Each one says something will happen for sure. On a busy Monday in flu season, it will not.
Practices use these lines because they work. People search for a GP when something hurts today. You do not have to give that up. You just have to add the honest limits.
Do not write: "No wait times. Same-day appointments guaranteed."
Write instead: "We hold appointments open each morning for urgent care. Most patients are seen within one to two days, and we will tell you the wait when you call."
The honest version also persuades better. It sounds like a real practice telling you how it runs. A slogan does not.
Can a GP say they "specialise in" something?
Here is where most compliance advice gets it plain wrong.
You will often hear that a health practitioner must never use the word "specialist". For general practice, that is not true. Some doctors finish their GP training and hold FRACGP or FACRRM. They go on the Specialist Register in general practice. For that doctor, "specialist general practitioner" is legally correct.
So the word itself is fine. The problem is when the word does not match the doctor's registration.
AHPRA sets out its view on its titles in health advertising page. Words like "specialist", "specialises in", "specialty" or "specialised" suggest the doctor holds specialist registration. If they do not, the ad is likely to mislead. Here are 2 ways a GP practice trips over this:
- A doctor with general registration who has not finished fellowship is described as "specialising in" anything at all.
- A specialist GP is described as specialising in a smaller area. Their specialist registration is in general practice. Writing "specialises in skin cancer medicine" suggests a second registration that does not exist.
AHPRA gives you safer words itself. It says "substantial experience in" or "working primarily in" are less likely to mislead.
Do not write: "Dr [Name] specialises in women's health and skin checks."
Write instead: "Dr [Name] is a specialist general practitioner (FRACGP) with substantial experience in women's health and skin checks."
Watch for one related trap. Section 115A keeps the title "surgeon" for doctors with specialist registration in surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology, or ophthalmology. A doctor who does minor procedures at your practice is not a surgeon on your website.
Do your blog and health information pages count as ads?
They do. This is the risk that quietly grows while nobody is looking.
Every word you publish about your services is advertising. Health education pages get no free pass. Most GP websites carry a library of patient articles. Often they were bought from a content supplier or shared from a health network. These days, many are written by AI and posted without a check. Nobody on staff wrote them, and nobody has read them since.
Those pages are where the breaches hide. Look for claims about what a treatment achieves, named prescription medicines and words like "cure" or "eliminate". Also look for condition pages that read like a promise. A "general information only" note at the bottom does not fix a wrong claim. Blaming the AI is no defence either. I covered that in what happened when I asked ChatGPT to write AHPRA-compliant content.
The fix is simple, if a little dull. Export a list of every page on your site. Read the ones you did not write. Delete or rewrite anything you cannot stand behind.
Which rule does each mistake break?
It helps to keep these straight. The 2 sets of rules have different watchdogs and different fixes.
| The mistake | Rule it breaks | What to write instead |
|---|---|---|
| Google reviews or star widgets on your own site | AHPRA, section 133 (testimonials) | Link to your Google Business Profile. Put no clinical reviews on pages you control. |
| "Bulk billing available" | Australian Consumer Law, section 18 | Say exactly who is bulk billed and what everyone else pays. |
| "Same-day appointments", "no wait times" | Australian Consumer Law, section 18 | Add the limits: the usual wait, urgent care slots, and that you will tell them when they book. |
| "Specialises in" without specialist registration | AHPRA, section 133 and section 115A (titles) | "Substantial experience in" or "working primarily in". |
| Unchecked bought-in or AI health articles | AHPRA, section 133 (misleading claims) | Check every page. Rewrite or remove what you cannot back up. |
Notice the pattern. The AHPRA breaches come from trying to prove you are good. The Consumer Law breaches come from trying to sound easy to see. The urges differ, but the result is the same.
How do you check your own site in 20 minutes?
You do not need an audit to find the obvious problems. Work through this list in order.
- Search your own site for the risky words. In Google, type site:yourpractice.com.au plus each of these: specialist, specialising, bulk billing, same day, no wait, "best", "guaranteed", reviews, testimonial.
- Open every doctor profile. Check each title against that doctor's entry on the AHPRA public register. Titles must match the registration, not the hope.
- Look at the top of your homepage. That is where billing and access promises usually sit.
- Check the footer and the booking widget. Outside booking tools often add star ratings you never approved.
- Open five blog posts you did not write. If you cannot say who wrote one and when it was last checked, start your clean-up there.
Most practices find something in the first ten minutes. That is normal, and you can fix it. AHPRA usually starts by asking you to correct the ad. Practices that fix it quickly mostly settle the matter at that point.
If you would rather not do this yourself, that is the work I do. My website copywriting service gives you website copy that follows the rules from the first draft. And SEO for healthcare explains how to rank on Google without the claims that create the risk.
This is general information for practices and their marketing teams. It is not legal advice. The AHPRA advertising guidelines, the National Law and the Australian Consumer Law change from time to time. Check the current versions on the AHPRA and ACCC websites. Get formal advice for big decisions.
Free: The AHPRA and TGA Website Check
The 20 things clinic websites get flagged for, in one checklist. Work through your own site in about 15 minutes.
Get the checklist →