I write your
Written to pass AHPRA and TGA review and still book patients. Compliance checked line by line, with the evidence report attached.
Amisha Sharma · compliance checked copy · evidence report with every page
Amisha Sharma is a compliance-first copywriter at Commas & Chaos and an ISB alumna. She writes compliance checked healthcare copy for Australian practices and agencies. No delivered work of hers has been flagged by a regulator to date. Every page she writes is checked 226 ways before it ships.
"The best SIL and SDA provider in Australia, endorsed by the NDIS. Vacancies always available."
It implies the NDIS endorses you, advertises a vacancy that may not be open, and claims to be the best. That is three problems in one line.
"What SIL is, what SDA is, and how the funding works. Our current vacancies, our team, and how to enquire."
Honest, specific, and calm. This is the version a family trusts with a big decision.
Compliant copy has a reputation for being boring. That is a writing problem, not a compliance one. I fix the writing.
NDIS marketing is watched by the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission. If your pages mislead, or hint that the NDIA backs you, some of them may be breaking the rules right now. Not sure? Check in 60 seconds, whether your site is live or still being written.
Six quick questions. Your results, straight away.
I'm a SIL and SDA copywriter. Your website copy is the core, and it's where most providers start. Need Google Ads, social, or SEO articles too? I write those as well.
The page that decides if they stay or bounce.
One clear page each, so SIL and SDA are never confused.
Your team and experience. The trust page.
The questions people are unsure how to ask.
For a campaign or a referral push.
Ads that pass Google and follow the NDIS Code.
Captions that survive Meta review and stay honest.
The questions participants Google, answered by you.
What to publish, where, and in what order.
226 checks on your current site. Fixed at $1,500.
One writer for all of it. Quoted flat, upfront.
NDIS marketing sits under the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission. I write to the NDIS Code of Conduct every day. No delivered work of mine has been flagged by a regulator to date. Your standing is safe with me.
I structure your pages so Google and AI search can understand them. That gives you a real shot at showing up when people look for a SIL or SDA provider nearby.
Copy that reads like an expert provider, not a discount deal. It brings in the participants who settle in and stay.

You are never a ticket number in an agency queue. Your pages are never handed to a junior or a content mill. You brief me, I write, and the person answering your email is the person who wrote your homepage. That is why the quality holds, from page one to page fifty.
Tell me about your service and what you need written. Five minutes.
A 30-minute call, then one flat fee. No hourly billing, no lock-in.
Every page written, checked, and handed over ready to publish. Two rounds of edits.

I'm Amisha Sharma, a compliance-first copywriter for regulated Australian brands, NDIS SIL and SDA providers included. I am an ISB alumna, agency trained on Australian accounts. No delivered work of mine has been flagged by a regulator to date. My job is copy that passes compliance review, ranks on Google, gets quoted by AI, and still sounds like a human wrote it. Every page runs through my 226-point GhostRank audit before it ships. I write like my own name is on the line.
Because most of them will get your service flagged. Here is the honest comparison.
Ranks you, then gets you flagged. They know Google. They have never read the NDIS Code of Conduct or the Practice Standards.
Keeps you safe and hands you copy no one reads. Safe and invisible is still invisible.
Copy that gets pulled. You save a few hundred dollars and risk a complaint.
Fast, generic, no judgement. It cannot tell a safe sentence from a breach.
Compliant, ranks, cited by AI, fills your vacancies. I do all four. And I personally watch every word, so you always know who is writing: me. Every page passes the 226-point GhostRank check first.
Short version: you can market your service openly, but you must be honest and you cannot imply the NDIA backs you. Here is how that plays out on a real SIL and SDA site.
None of this is guesswork. The rules are public, and I write to the primary sources. The clearest place to start is the NDIS Code of Conduct, which sets out how every provider must act: with honesty, integrity and transparency. The detail that catches most providers is the duty to protect each participant's choice and control, the ban on misleading vacancy claims, and the need to keep SIL and SDA funding clearly separate. Registered providers also work to the NDIS Practice Standards, which set the quality bar for how you deliver and describe your service. I read both every time the rules touch a page. In 2026 that reading is not optional. It is the difference between a website that fills your homes and one that quietly waits for a complaint.
GhostRank is my own 226-point audit. It checks how a page ranks on Google, how it reads to AI search, and where it breaks the NDIS rules. You hire me as a copywriter. I run every page through it before it ships, and the report comes to you with the work.

Five pages for $2,490. Ten pages for $4,390.
Your full site. Ads and articles, if you want them.
Founding rate: $1,690 for 5 pages, $2,950 for 10. It runs until 30 September 2026, or the first three clients. In exchange I ask for a testimonial and permission to show the before and after.
Dear provider,
You built this service on care. You are honest about who your homes suit and who they do not. You put the participant first, every time.
Then you look at how some providers market. Big promises. Vacancies that are not really open. SIL and SDA bundled together like they are one thing.
Most of them will not get away with it for long. The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission watches this closely, and a misleading vacancy or a false claim is one complaint away from a very bad month.
You do not have to market that way. The providers that last sound honest, warm, and clear. That is what a participant wants, and what a support coordinator trusts.
That is the copy I write. I explain what SIL is and what SDA is, in plain words. I reinforce choice and control, and I never imply the NDIS endorses you. No delivered work of mine has been flagged by a regulator to date.
You look after the participants. Let me look after the words that bring them to you.
Fixed prices. Evidence report. AHPRA and TGA checked before you see a single line.
Yes, as long as it is honest. You can advertise a vacancy that is genuinely open, and you can explain your SIL support and your SDA homes. You must not advertise a vacancy that is not real, and you must not bundle or blur SIL and SDA funding, because they are different funding types. You also cannot imply the NDIS endorses you. Full guide here.
They are two different things, funded in two different ways. SIL is Supported Independent Living: the support and staffing that helps a person live in their home. SDA is Specialist Disability Accommodation: the specialist home itself. A person can have one or both. A participant chooses their SIL provider and their SDA separately and freely.
Yes, and it is mostly local. The searches that fill homes are "SIL provider near me", suburb terms, and terms like "SDA vacancy [suburb]". A provider with a strong Google Business Profile and a page for SIL and a page for SDA usually outranks bigger competitors running generic sites. Expect meaningful movement in 3 to 6 months, and be suspicious of anyone promising faster.
Yes, with care. A participant's story is allowed when they give genuine, informed consent and their privacy and dignity are respected. You cannot pressure anyone, and you cannot use a story to imply a guaranteed outcome. Real, consented stories are powerful, and they are compliant when they are honest.
Almost every channel is open: local SEO, SIL and SDA pages, participant and support coordinator education, Google Ads, social content, and referral outreach. The rules restrict how you say it (honest vacancies, no conflating SIL and SDA funding, no implied NDIS endorsement, no guaranteed outcomes), and they leave every useful channel open.
Tell me about your service and what you need written. I read every brief myself.
Currently taking on new SIL and SDA projects
Faster on your phone? WhatsApp me your website link.
Prefer email? amisha@commasandchaos.com