I write your
A SIL and SDA copywriter writes your website so it follows the NDIS Code of Conduct and still fills your vacancies. I'm Amisha Sharma, and I've delivered 200+ regulated Australian projects with zero breaches.
Amisha Sharma · 200+ regulated projects · zero breaches
Amisha Sharma is a compliance-first copywriter at Commas & Chaos and an ISB alumna. Since 2019 she has delivered 200+ regulated Australian projects for NDIS SIL and SDA providers with zero compliance breaches. Every page she writes is checked 226 ways before it ships.
"The best SIL and SDA provider in Australia, endorsed by the NDIS. Vacancies always available."
It implies the NDIS endorses you, advertises a vacancy that may not be open, and claims to be the best. That is three problems in one line.
"What SIL is, what SDA is, and how the funding works. Our current vacancies, our team, and how to enquire."
Honest, specific, and calm. This is the version a family trusts with a big decision.
Compliant copy has a reputation for being boring. That is a writing problem, not a compliance one. I fix the writing.
NDIS marketing is watched by the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission. If your pages mislead, or hint that the NDIA backs you, some of them may be breaking the rules right now. Not sure? Check in 60 seconds, whether your site is live or still being written.
Six quick questions. Your results, straight away.
I'm a SIL and SDA copywriter. Your website is the core, and it's where most providers start. Need Google Ads, social, or SEO articles too? I write those as well.
The page that decides if they stay or bounce.
One clear page each, so SIL and SDA are never confused.
Your team and experience. The trust page.
The questions people are unsure how to ask.
For a campaign or a referral push.
Ads that pass Google and follow the NDIS Code.
Captions that survive Meta review and stay honest.
The questions participants Google, answered by you.
What to publish, where, and in what order.
One writer for all of it. Quoted flat, upfront.
One writer for your whole site.
Start a conversation →NDIS marketing sits under the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission. I write to the NDIS Code of Conduct every day, across 200+ regulated projects, with zero breaches. Your standing is safe with me.
I structure your pages so Google and AI search can understand them. That gives you a real shot at showing up when people look for a SIL or SDA provider nearby.
Copy that reads like an expert provider, not a discount deal. It brings in the participants who settle in and stay.

You are never a ticket number in an agency queue. Your pages are never handed to a junior or a content mill. You brief me, I write, and the person answering your email is the person who wrote your homepage. That is why the quality holds, from page one to page fifty.
Tell me about your service and what you need written. Five minutes.
A 30-minute call, then one flat fee. No hourly billing, no lock-in.
Every page written, checked, and handed over ready to publish. Two rounds of edits.
Ready to take the words off your plate?
Start a conversation →
I'm Amisha Sharma, a compliance-first copywriter for regulated Australian brands, NDIS SIL and SDA providers included. I am an ISB alumna and a former agency content lead. Since 2019 I have delivered 200+ regulated projects with zero breaches. My job is copy that passes compliance review, ranks on Google, gets quoted by AI, and still sounds like a human wrote it. Every page runs through my 226-point GhostRank audit before it ships. I write like my own name is on the line.
Because most of them will get your service flagged. Here is the honest comparison.
Ranks you, then gets you flagged. They know Google. They have never read the NDIS Code of Conduct or the Practice Standards.
Keeps you safe and hands you copy no one reads. Safe and invisible is still invisible.
Copy that gets pulled. You save a few hundred dollars and risk a complaint.
Fast, generic, no judgement. It cannot tell a safe sentence from a breach.
Compliant, ranks, cited by AI, fills your vacancies. I do all four. And I personally watch every word, so you always know who is writing: me. Every page passes the 226-point GhostRank check first.
Short version: you can market your service openly, but you must be honest and you cannot imply the NDIA backs you. Here is how that plays out on a real SIL and SDA site.
None of this is guesswork. The rules are public, and I write to the primary sources. The clearest place to start is the NDIS Code of Conduct, which sets out how every provider must act: with honesty, integrity and transparency. The detail that catches most providers is the duty to protect each participant's choice and control, the ban on misleading vacancy claims, and the need to keep SIL and SDA funding clearly separate. Registered providers also work to the NDIS Practice Standards, which set the quality bar for how you deliver and describe your service. I read both every time the rules touch a page. In 2026 that reading is not optional. It is the difference between a website that fills your homes and one that quietly waits for a complaint.
Not sure where your site stands?
Check your site in 60 seconds →GhostRank is my proprietary 226-point audit. It checks how a page ranks on Google, how it reads to AI search, and where it breaks the NDIS rules. Providers pay $500 for this audit on its own. When you hire me, every page runs through it before it ships. You never pay for it.




A landing page, or a small site.
Your full site. Ads and articles, if you want them.
The audit alone sells for $500. Every project includes it free. Do the maths on a $600 page.
Dear provider,
You built this service on care. You match support workers to people with real thought. You are honest about who your homes suit and who they do not. You put the participant first, every time.
Then you look at how some providers market. Big promises. Vacancies that are not really open. SIL and SDA bundled together like they are one thing. And you wonder how they get away with it.
Most of them will not for long. The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission watches this closely. The NDIS Code of Conduct and the NDIS Practice Standards set a high bar. A misleading vacancy or a false claim is one complaint away from a very bad month.
You do not have to market that way. The providers that last sound honest, warm, and clear. That is what a participant wants. It is what a support coordinator trusts. It is also what the rules push you toward.
That is the copy I write. I explain what SIL is and what SDA is, in plain words. I explain how the funding works and who each option suits. I answer the questions people ask before they trust anyone with their home. I reinforce their choice and control. I never imply the NDIS endorses you. Honest, because that is the rule. Persuasive, because it feels safe.
I have written for regulated Australian brands for years. Over 200 projects. Zero breaches. I treat your compliance like my own. You will never wonder if a line could draw a complaint, because I have already checked it 226 ways.
You look after the participants. Let me look after the words that bring them to you.
P.S. When you are ready, tell me about your service. I read and reply to every message myself. That is where we start.
Yes, as long as it is honest. You can advertise a vacancy that is genuinely open, and you can explain your SIL support and your SDA homes. You must not advertise a vacancy that is not real, and you must not bundle or blur SIL and SDA funding, because they are different funding types. You also cannot imply the NDIS endorses you. Full guide here.
They are two different things, funded in two different ways. SIL is Supported Independent Living: the support and staffing that helps a person live in their home. SDA is Specialist Disability Accommodation: the specialist home itself. A person can have one or both. A participant chooses their SIL provider and their SDA separately and freely. Good copy keeps them clear and never ties them together.
Yes, and it is mostly local. The searches that fill homes are "SIL provider near me", suburb terms, and terms like "SDA vacancy [suburb]". A provider with a strong Google Business Profile and a page for SIL and a page for SDA usually outranks bigger competitors running generic sites. Expect meaningful movement in 3 to 6 months, and be suspicious of anyone promising faster.
Yes, with care. A participant's story is allowed when they give genuine, informed consent and their privacy and dignity are respected. You cannot pressure anyone, and you cannot use a story to imply a guaranteed outcome. Real, consented stories are powerful, and they are compliant when they are honest.
Almost every channel is open: local SEO, SIL and SDA pages, participant and support coordinator education, Google Ads, social content, and referral outreach. The rules restrict how you say it (honest vacancies, no conflating SIL and SDA funding, no implied NDIS endorsement, no guaranteed outcomes), and they leave every useful channel open. The compliant version usually converts better because it is more specific.
Yes. Most providers come to me in 2026 with a site that is either bending a rule or saying nothing. I run every page through a 226-point GhostRank audit first. Then I rewrite the pages that need it, usually the homepage, the SIL and SDA pages, and the about page. You keep what already works and fix only what is at risk.
I write to the current NDIS Code of Conduct and Practice Standards, and add a short note on why each claim is safe. That note makes your next compliance review fast and cheap. No writer can promise a regulator's final view. Across 200+ regulated projects since 2019, not one page has been flagged.
Yes, as an add-on. Website copy is the core, but I also write Google Ads, social ads, SEO articles and your content plan. NDIS ads must clear Google policy, Meta policy and the NDIS Code of Conduct at the same time. I write them to pass all of it at once, so fewer ads get rejected and campaigns stay live.
About a week for a single page. Two to three weeks for a small site of five to eight pages. Two rounds of edits are included in every quote. Rush timelines are possible if your launch date is tight, so tell me the deadline up front.
Projects start at $600 AUD and scale with scope. Every quote is a flat fee, agreed upfront, with no hourly billing. The 226-point GhostRank audit is included free, and it sells on its own for $500. So a $600 page effectively costs $100 once you count the audit.
Tell me about your service and what you need written. I read every brief myself.
Currently taking on new SIL and SDA projects
Faster on your phone? WhatsApp me your website link.
Prefer email? amisha@commasandchaos.com