Before-and-after photos suggest a result. So AHPRA, the body behind the health ad rules, treats them as a high-risk claim. It sees them as setting up a fair expectation of benefit in your patient's mind. For cosmetic procedures, the Medical Board guidelines are even stricter, and the safe answer is to leave them out. Think of a before-and-after as a testimonial in picture form. Instead, you can show your clinic, your process and what to expect at a consultation.

Key takeaways

  • A before-and-after suggests a result, so AHPRA treats it as a claim. For cosmetic work, treat it as off limits.
  • It is really a testimonial in picture form, so the testimonial rules apply to photos too.
  • The common breaches are editing, uneven lighting or angles, missing consent and captions that promise results.
  • Show your clinic, your process and what to expect at a consultation, and leave the makeover shots out.

Can you use before-and-after photos under AHPRA?

They are high risk, and for cosmetic procedures the safest answer is no. Before-and-after photos suggest a result. The AHPRA advertising guidelines treat that as a claim that sets up a fair expectation of benefit in your patient's mind. The Medical Board cosmetic guidelines go further. They rule out makeover photos for cosmetic procedures.

If you have not read the general rules yet, start with my main guide on what your clinic can and cannot say under AHPRA. You can also visit the AHPRA advertising hub.

Why are before-and-after photos so risky?

They promise a result. Without a single word, a pair of photos says "this is what will happen to you". That is exactly the expectation the rules are built to stop.

Here is the simplest way to think about it. A before-and-after is a testimonial in picture form. The rules ban a patient quote about a result. The same thinking applies to a photo of a result. For the wording side of that rule, see my guide on patient testimonials and AHPRA.

There is a practical reason the rule is strict. Photos persuade people in a way words cannot. A nervous patient scrolling your gallery does not read the fine print about how results vary. They see a result and assume it will be theirs. The rules treat that impression as the claim, whatever disclaimer you place nearby.

What makes a before-and-after non-compliant?

The main problem is that the photo suggests a result. On top of that, these issues turn a photo into a clear breach.

  • Editing or touch-ups. This means filters, retouching or lighting tricks that improve the "after".
  • Uneven conditions. The two shots have different lighting, angles, makeup or poses, which makes the change look bigger.
  • Captions that promise results. "Real results" or "amazing transformation" stacks a claim on top of the photo.
  • Missing or unclear consent. You use a patient's photos without proper, specific permission.
  • Suggesting a typical result. You present one person's result as what a new patient can expect.

So many conditions have to be met that most clinics are safer not using before-and-after photos at all.

A worked example: reframing a before-and-after

It helps to see the fix on a real page. Picture a skin clinic that wants to promote a treatment. Here is the risky version, followed by a safe rewrite.

The risky version. The page has a gallery of photo pairs. Each pair shows a patient before and after. The caption reads "Real results from our clients". A banner says "See the transformation".

Three things make this a breach. First, the photo pair suggests a result, which is a claim. Second, the word "results" stacks a promise on top. Third, "transformation" promises a change the clinic cannot promise a new patient.

The compliant reframe. Swap the gallery for content that informs without promising. Show one clear photo of your treatment room and your team. Add a short paragraph that explains how the treatment works, step by step. List the usual recovery time and the main risks in plain words. Finish with a line about what happens at a consultation.

The new page does more for you than the gallery did. A careful patient learns what the visit feels like. They see your process. They get honest information about risk. None of it suggests a sure result, so none of it breaks the rule. You keep their trust and lose the breach.

The principle is simple. Describe your service, and leave the result out of the picture.

Many people get consent wrong. A signed form does not make a before-and-after safe. The photo can still be a claim, even with perfect consent. Consent is a separate rule that sits on top of the ad rule.

If you use any patient photo, the consent has to be valid. Valid consent has a few clear parts.

  • Specific, not general. The patient agrees to this exact photo, used in this exact way. A blanket line in an intake form is not enough.
  • Informed. The patient knows where the photo will appear and for how long. They know it may be shared publicly online.
  • Freely given. The patient does not feel pressured, and their care does not depend on saying yes.
  • Withdrawable. The patient can ask you to take the photo down later, and you do it.
  • Documented. You keep a written record of what they agreed to and when.

Even with all of that in place, a cosmetic before-and-after is still off limits. Consent fixes the privacy problem, but the claim is still there. That is why most clinics are better off not using these photos at all.

What can you show instead?

You can still build a site that looks good and earns trust. You just show the right things.

  • Your clinic and your team, so a new patient can picture what the visit is like.
  • Your process, from consultation to aftercare, explained step by step.
  • Plain facts about the procedure, the risks and recovery.
  • What to expect at a consultation, which is where any real assessment happens anyway.

Your content does not have to be dry. Try a short video tour of your clinic. Add a clear guide to the steps of the procedure and an honest section on recovery. These do more for a careful patient than a gallery ever could. They build trust in you, instead of in a result you cannot promise.

Does the rule apply outside cosmetic clinics?

Yes. People link the before-and-after problem with cosmetic work. But the rule sits in the general AHPRA guidelines, so it covers every registered field. Dermatology, dentistry, physiotherapy, weight services and skin clinics all face the same test. If a photo pair suggests a result, it is a claim, whatever your field.

Two areas need special care. The ad rules restrict claims about weight and body shape. So a weight-loss before-and-after carries extra risk on top of the result claim. And any "after" that has been edited, even a little, goes from risky to a clear breach. The safest rule for every field is the same. Describe your service, and leave the result out of the picture.

Which rules do cosmetic clinics break?

Cosmetic clinics feel the most pressure to show results, so this is where most breaches happen. Think of a makeover gallery, a reshared patient selfie or an influencer's "after" shot. All of them are claims about results. All of them also fall under the stricter cosmetic guidelines. You can get the full picture in my guide on AHPRA advertising guidelines for cosmetic clinics.

You can check your own site this week. Open every page and every social profile. Ask yourself if each photo, or its caption, suggests a result. If it does, take it down or rework it.

This is general guidance for clinic owners and marketers. It is not legal advice. AHPRA and the Medical Board update their guidance from time to time. Check the current versions, and get formal advice for high-stakes pages.


Free: The AHPRA and TGA Website Check

The 20 things clinic websites get flagged for, in one checklist. Work through your own site in about 15 minutes.

Get the checklist →