Your OT website

What do OT websites get wrong?

I read 82 Australian OT practice websites, 369 pages in all, on 29 September 2026. Here is what you should check on yours.

commasandchaos.com

The biggest flag

Of 82 sites, 18 used the word specialist.

Only medical, dental and podiatry staff can hold an approved specialty. No OT can use the title, so take it off your site.

commasandchaos.com

NDIS wording

The NDIA does not approve your services.

The NDIA runs the NDIS, and it approves no one's services. Even so, 2 sites called their staff NDIS Approved Occupational Therapists.

commasandchaos.com

Funding promises

Of 82 sites, 6 promised a funding result.

The NDIA decides what a plan funds, so you cannot promise it. Only 4 of 82 sites said plainly that funding is never a sure thing.

commasandchaos.com
Read the full post

Testimonials

Of 82 sites, 11 showed quotes about therapy progress.

Health ads cannot use testimonials, whoever pays for the care. NDIS funding does not change that, so take these quotes down.

commasandchaos.com

What you can show

Reviews about your service are fine.

Comments about customer service or how you talk with clients are not testimonials. Comments about clinical results are, so leave those out.

commasandchaos.com

The good news

Of 82 sites, 47 were clean.

The other 35 tripped at least one flag. So this is easy for you to fix, and most OT practices already get it right.

commasandchaos.com

What to do

Describe your focus, and leave out the result.

For example, say your OTs work mainly with children. Say the NDIA decides what each plan funds.

Tap for the full rewrite table

commasandchaos.com
Read the full post